| Solaris (**) | ||
| written and directed by Steven Soderbergh adapted from the novel by Stanislaw Lem | ||
|
Rick Norwood
Stanislaw Lem made a mild stir in the literary world when his 1961 novel Solaris was translated first from Polish into French and
then from French into English. Critics from prestigious journals, who would turn up their collective noses at
Robert A. Heinlein or Isaac Asimov, praised it
for its wonderful new ideas -- ideas that were new when they first appeared in the
Gernsback Amazing Stories thirty years earlier.
Lem then went on to make a minor splash in SF fandom, by writing letters to the top SF fanzines explaining why his SF was so much better
than the garbage Heinlein and Asimov were turning out. In 1971, the Russian director Andrei Tarkovski made an embarrassingly ham-handed film
from the book, a film certain people have listed as one of the ten greatest SF films of all time. But these are people who
think Alphaville is one of the ten greatest SF films of all time. Their standard of greatness is how far a film distances itself
from the technical polish of Hollywood.
The new version of Solaris is a much better film than the Russian version, but still empty, because the profound questions it
raises are the same questions we raised when we were Sophomores in college: How do we know what is real and what isn't? If you could
really believe that your fantasies were really real, would fantasy reality be any different from real reality? If you died and were
replaced by an identical copy of yourself, would it make any difference? These are all questions that were raised in magazine SF in
the thirties and in television SF in the sixties. And so we know from the outset that Solaris, following longstanding
tradition, is not about to make a fool of itself by actually trying to answer any of these questions. It is just going to raise
them and then leave us hanging.
And so we enjoy the intelligence with which the characters and setting are introduced without clumsy voice-over narration. We wonder
how the main character, a psychiatrist, is able to clear time in his busy schedule to go gallivanting through space -- and then
realize what a tremendous relief it must be for him to get away from all those pestering patients. We admire the acting, the
characterization, the special effects -- and then we find ourselves waiting for the next visual quote from 2001. It is a sign of
the times that they put clothes on the Star Child -- unlike the novel.
And then we become annoyed that none of the characters is at all interested in actually making contact with the aliens. They
are only interested in themselves. I suppose this incurious attitude is one of the points that Lem and Soderbergh are trying
to make. But my own experience leads me to believe that mankind possesses more curiosity than they give us credit for.
For all its polish and pretensions of profundity, the plot of Solaris is almost
identical to the plot of Star Trek - The Motion Picture.
Rick Norwood is a mathematician and writer whose small press publishing house, Manuscript Press, has published books by Hal Clement, R.A. Lafferty, and Hal Foster. He is also the editor of Comics Revue Monthly, which publishes such classic comic strips as Flash Gordon, Sky Masters, Modesty Blaise, Tarzan, Odd Bodkins, Casey Ruggles, The Phantom, Gasoline Alley, Krazy Kat, Alley Oop, Little Orphan Annie, Barnaby, Buz Sawyer, and Steve Canyon. |
|
|
If you find any errors, typos or other stuff worth mentioning,
please send it to editor@sfsite.com.
Copyright © 1996-2013 SF Site All Rights Reserved Worldwide